Monday, February 29, 2016

Anecdotes And The Alternative


Hi all. 

Many are asking me the ages old question, "Does complementary and alternative medicine work?", since there has been an argument (among many) between conventional and alternative medicine, that states that conventional medicine is more scientific and based on scientific studies and the scientific method, including double blind studies, clinical trials, etc., while alternative medicine tends to be more anecdotal, based on hearsay, folk medicine, etc.

I am unsure as to whether this is an actual disagreement, a philosophical difference, or something else entirely, so I will attempt to clarify. These particular issues and arguments are vast, many and relevant, and I do not wish to go into them here necessarily.

It is actually my personal opinion that texts and author/s are relatively pretty good at stating and quoting different studies, experiments, and statistics, related to alternative practices and methods presented in their books and articles, in order to prove a point or teaching.

This is actually somewhat more in line with mainstream medicine. I think though there are instances where this falls short and it is not exactly clear how a number, percentage, or success rate is arrived at and the details around it and the specific study or experiment.

Research can be both quantitative as well as qualitative, and both may be valid methods when used correctly. Rather than going into a tirade against authors or texts which is probably not even necessary in this case because the approach is generally pretty good, let's say I am disagreeing in general with certain forms of “just” or "only" anecdotal evidence.

I humbly believe that in many instances even if there are subjective and / or anecdotal claims that they are better off put through the ringer of quantitative research at the very least, or other methods to prove the safety and success of certain alternative methods and products.

Also more warnings and clarification should be employed, not only on products themselves, but when discussing methods and products. Certain stricter regulation at times is in good order as well as the testing of products.

So all this is I am spouting, is also obviously subjective and anecdotal, but it stems from this fascinating personal story:

In dealing with certain skin problems related to eczema / tinea / ringworm, I tried all sorts of natural methods wanting to avoid steroids and other harmful substances and medications.

A number of friends began telling me about a substance called MMS / Miracle Mineral Supplement or something, and were singing its praises as a panacea and cure-all. I decided to jump on the band wagon, did some reading on the internet, some basic so called research (I thought), and I was pretty much sold.

One of the friends recommending the stuff asked me if she should “test” me with Kinesiology / muscle testing to see if it would be good for me. Seeing as this was over the phone / computer and being a purist against practitioners testing their own muscles for a patient's needs, I refused and said it was fine and I'd try it.

I began using the stuff, and after every time I took it, I felt nauseous, dizzy and weak. The stuff itself gave off a bleachy smell that reminded me clearly of car exhaust in a traffic jam. As recommended by the product literature and those advising me, I cut down on the dosage in order to reduce my so called “detox” reactions that I might be having, but this did not change and my health felt worse, while my original symptoms did not change.

After a number of weeks, enough was enough. I grabbed the bottle, held it to my chest with my right hand, stood in middle of the room without shoes, closed my eyes, and let my body loosen up giving it slack. This is a very simple self Kinesiology test for affinity to items, medicines, objects, foods, etc. and in general works quite well (but it is dynamic and can sometimes change from time to time and session to session especially after being treated for allergies which it can also test for). I swayed back and almost fell over. BIG NO! That's what my body was telling me and it don't lie.

The one friend who I refused to let test me over the phone, was then upset I did not let her test me after she found out, and the clincher is that my Naturopath at the time, an MD, Homeopath, Iridologist, examined me, looked at me, and said with a serious look,”What have you done to your liver?!” I thought to myself but did not tell him, “Let's not even go there!” “I'm going to give you something among the remedies to cleanse and calm it.” Need I say more? Really?!

The stuff was sitting in my closet for a few years up until a few months ago somehow after that, when I finally poured it out and recycled the plastic bottle. Maybe I should have looked into it more, done more research, asked around, or tested myself to begin with.

It still bears more looking into, but apparently according to many including some reputable Naturopaths, despite all the claims, the stuff is noxious, it does more harm than good, the fellow who produces, sells, and markets the stuff is a fake and the whole thing is a scam in general. Supposedly, even all the positive claims and attestations surrounding MMS somehow originated from the fellow either directly or indirectly. Whose to know who to believe or what to listen to? My personal take... You decide for yourself...

Let's use numbers, statistics and measurements. Research is a means of showing how things can or cannot be shown or proven as a whole. Even if it's general and statistical. There's nothing wrong with anecdotal evidence, but a lot more people would feel safer and would be more convinced if the research were done and positive results proven. It would really help CAM move forward in a well needed quantum leap.

So don't necessarily take anyone's word for it. Anecdotes are great, but at least see how many people have them and whether positive or negative. Do the research if and when you can to the best of your ability, and speak to people and practitioners you trust who want what's best for you truly.

Wake up and be aware!

Aids and the Alternative

In my humble opinion, the best thing is to use the Alternative Medicine approach as a treatment for Aids.

Primarily, AIDS is defined by what appears to be severe immune deficiency and is distinguished from other diseases by the fact that it has no constant, specific symptoms. Because of this and other discrepancies, there is much confusion and argument as to what AIDS really is and even whether to classify it as a disease.

Generally, any degree of immune suppression where HIV is present is classified as AIDS, but the same degree of suppression in the absence of HIV is not defined as such.



Connected to this is the major argument, whether in fact HIV even causes AIDS. Some believe that it actually causes the immune suppression that leads to AIDS, while others argue that various environmental risk factors like drugs, substances, infections, and sexually transmitted diseases are the real cause of the immune suppression, and that HIV is just the byproduct of this suppressed immune system.

Conclusively, although there may be a strong correlation between HIV and AIDS, and most people with AIDS also test positively for HIV, it is not a total correlation, nor proof of causation.

The AIDS community still stand by its belief hat HIV causes AIDS, but they are starting to concede that HIV alone may not lead to AIDS without one or more co-factors. What is clear at present, is that the immune systems of people with AIDS, are damaged, and the most vital thing is to explore which treatments can restore the immune system, resulting in the restoration of health.

Whereas the usual view of AIDS treatment focuses on the elimination of HIV, the alternative view places the main emphasis on restoring overall health by eliminating the co-factors.

Malnutrition is a common problem with people who are HIV positive, and is almost universal in those suffering from AIDS. Diet and nutrition are thus essential in treating AIDS. As well, persons with AIDS, HIV positive people, and even general large segments of the US population, have also been shown to be deficient in specific vitamins and minerals critical to immune system function.

So, whole, unprocessed, foods with essential nutrients and no additives should be eaten, especially by those suffering from AIDS. Fresh organic, vegetables, fruits, fish and meat are suggested, while eliminating refined carbohydrates and replacing them with complex ones. Also, specific nutrients, vitamins, and minerals are commonly supplemented in HIV positive and AIDS patients that are lacking.

The use of herbal medicine for treating AIDS is widespread today with additional research going on to assess further applications and effectiveness. For the most parts, herbs are utilized for their antiviral, antibacterial, tonifying, and stress reducing qualities.

Acupuncture has been shown to be an effective and vital tool for treating AIDS and HIV infection, specifically when combined with other alternative therapies such as herbal medicine.

Hyperthermia like our body's natural fever mechanism, can be used against infection and disease, by raising the body's temperature and thereby increasing the production of antibodies and interferon, which stimulates immune function.

This heating of the body and promoting sweat helps to detoxify heavy metals, pesticides, and chemicals, and toxins stored in the fat cells. HIV has been shown to be heat sensitive, and will become increasingly inactive as body temperature is progressively raised above normal for extended periods.

Use of oxygen therapy as a primary treatment for HIV infection, AIDS and its associated infections is a safe and most effective method. Using hyperbaric oxygen, ozone, or hydrogen peroxide to combat HIV, is much the same as the immune system using oxygen free radicals to destroy viral or bacterial infections.

There is an absolutely vital relationship between emotional states and our immune systems. Emotions such as guilt, anger, fear, and hopelessness are common among those with AIDS and add to the immune system's burden.

Therefore, any stress reduction strategy that can help one cope with negative emotions and influences that affect the nervous system is recommended. Mind / Body therapies such as relaxation, meditation, visualization, psychotherapy or counseling, treatment or group work will all help improve immune function.